- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
/* This construction seems to be more optimiser friendly.
(without it gcc does the isDIGIT test and the *s - '0' separately)
With it gcc on arm is managing 6 instructions (6 cycles) per digit.
In theory the optimiser could deduce how far to unroll the loop
before checking for overflow. */
if (++s < send) {
int digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
digit = *s - '0';
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send) {
/* Now got 9 digits, so need to check
each time for overflow. */
digit = *s - '0';
while (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9
&& (value < max_div_10
|| (value == max_div_10
&& digit <= max_mod_10))) {
value = value * 10 + digit;
if (++s < send)
digit = *s - '0';
else
break;
}
if (digit >= 0 && digit <= 9
&& (s < send)) {
/* value overflowed.
skip the remaining digits, don't
worry about setting *valuep. */
do {
s++;
} while (s < send && isDIGIT(*s));
numtype |=
IS_NUMBER_GREATER_THAN_UV_MAX;
goto skip_value;
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Follow us!